On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 06:35:07PM +0100, Richard Melville wrote:
> On 6 October 2017 at 17:18, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Alternatively, if openssl is to be left in the BLFS book, can libressl be
> added in order to extend choice? It seems odd that libressl is included as
> an alternative requirement on the openssh page, but it doesn't have a page
> of its own, only a link to the libressl website.
>
There are many packages which could be in BLFS. The number of
editors is few.
ĸen
--
Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather
boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth.
- Unseen Academicals
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
