Hi Bruce, Few days ago I suggested idea about start going from md5 checksum for more trustable, for example sha256, or gpg signing. Is some mistake in this idea? or not needing, or early? or some other reason?
I provided script in which I updated md5 checking method from 66 lfs packages for 51 and it works for all. Thanks. Zura. -------------------------------------------- On Mon, 12/18/17, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] python doc link update To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" <[email protected]> Date: Monday, December 18, 2017, 8:17 AM Alain Toussaint wrote: > Furthermore, the md5sum don't match. Actual package md5sum is > 5f9668cb0cf994d265774585ba622552 > > md5sum posted on > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/systemd/chapter03/packages.html > is 5e4a8a97d4221fc67561ca26e26bd575 > > I suppose the dev at python.org updated their documentation package. > > Alain > > 2017-12-17 21:42 GMT-05:00 Alain Toussaint <[email protected]>: >> For python, >> >> The documentation package is located at >> >> https://docs.python.org/ftp/python/doc/3.6.3/python-3.6.3-docs-html.tar.bz2 Hmm. I have the old version and a diff shows a lot of changes. Must be a stealth upgrade. I'll fix the book. Thanks. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
