On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 04:18:23PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> On 08/10/2018 03:54 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On my most recent build (LFS-svn-2018-07-26 so still using
> > glibc-2.27) I noticed that my toolchain test results (on an AMD
> > Fam15h machine, which is slow) did not totally match what the book
> > said:
> >
> > glibc-2.27 : only two failures,
> > FAIL: misc/tst-preadvwritev2
> > FAIL: misc/tst-preadvwritev64v2
>
> On i7:
>
> 075-glibc-2.28:FAIL: inet/tst-idna_name_classify
> 075-glibc-2.28:FAIL: misc/tst-ttyname
>
> Note that this is in chroot. We run these as root and I did not check as a
> non-privileged user like we do in coreutils.
>
> > binutils-2.31.1
> > No failures, and specifically
> > PASS: debug_msg.sh
>
> Is this done in chroot?
>
Yes, these are all from chroot, and I run the LFS tests (except bash,
coreutils, util-linux) as root.
> > gcc-8.2.0
> > for g++, two unexpected failures for g++.dg/pr83239.C for
> > -std=gnu++11 and -std=gnu++14
> > (no big deal)
>
> Yes, I got those also.
>
> > for libstdc++ _14_ unexpected failures in 27_io/filesystem (eight)
> > and experimental/filesystem (six) - the book only mentions six
>
> The six failures in 27_io/filesystem and experimental/filesystem are the
> same.
>
I have two more in 27_io/filesystem :
FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/operations/exists.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/operations/is_empty.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/operations/remove.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/operations/status.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/operations/symlink_status.cc execution test
^^^ these two
FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/operations/temp_directory_path.cc execution test
FAIL: experimental/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc execution test
FAIL: experimental/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc
execution test
FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/exists.cc execution test
FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/is_empty.cc execution test
FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/remove.cc execution test
FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/temp_directory_path.cc execution test
And my total is
# of unexpected failures 14
but the book says to expect 6.
If I had had another 2 failures there, I could have said it was
about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin
https://wiki.lspace.org/mediawiki/Angels ;-)
> > BUT: zero failures in the mpx tests, the kernel config is
> > # CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX is not set
>
> Same setting and results.
>
> -- Bruce
>
Anyway, just my initial datapoints.
ĸen
--
Entropy not found, thump keyboard to continue
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
