On 2019-02-28 19:56 +0100, Christer Solskogen via lfs-dev wrote: > On 26.02.2019 05:14, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: > > On 2019-02-25 20:31 +0000, DJ Lucas (LFS) via lfs-dev wrote: > > > On February 25, 2019 11:44:00 AM CST, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev < > > > lfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > > > > Now GCC relys on ISL (https://repo.or.cz/isl.git) to enable graphite > > > > optimization, instead of Cloog-PPL and PPL. > > > > > > > > We should update this in LFS Appendix C. > > > > > > Better, just add it to the book in the 8.5 cycle and remove the note. It's > > > a > > > tiny addition. > > > > Another issue: ISL is also an optional dependency of Binutils (to enable > > parallel linking of ld.gold). And, ISL must be built after GMP. So if we > > would > > do that the build sequence should be changed to: > > > > Where in the binutils sources is this? I can't seem to find anything in > the latest release of binutils.
Oh ld.gold doesn't need ISL. Why did I believe so? Maybe ISL was needed by earlier ld.gold versions, or another linker. -- Xi Ruoyao <xry...@mengyan1223.wang> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
