On 4/4/19 1:18 PM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On 03/04/2019 22:49, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On 02/04/2019 22:21, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On 29/03/2019 11:16, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 14:35, James B via lfs-dev
<[email protected]> wrote:
And then Python (which meson depends on) isn't exactly straightforward to
bootstrap,
and doubly so for multilib environments.
Well, don't forget that someone in GLibc-land decied that they should
make building
GLibc dependent on Python3, after it have never been subservient to an
interpreter
before,
You sure? I think it has been using perl for years. Maybe perl is not required
anymore now (need to test).
As a matter of fact, perl is no more required for building glibc. More tests
are said to fail, though (28 FAIL instead of 4, out of more than 5400).
For the record: the 24 tests that fail, all fail because they run "mtrace",
which is a perl script.
This is getting confusing. The subject is meson, but we are talking
about perl, python, and glibc.
Perhaps a clarification would be helpful here.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
