On 2019-04-30 13:46 +0800, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote: > On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 12:08, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev > <lfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > > > > by virtue of pointing to the /lib/udev, which is arch-specific, > > > > It's not. /lib/udev only contains udev scripts and some executable > > helpers for > > udevd. There are no libraries in it. > > > > We can not have two udevd instances for x86_64 and i686, so udevd > > is not arch- > > specific. Run `ps -e | grep udevd` and you won't see something > > like "udevd-32" > > or "udevd-64". > > I think you may have misunderstood, or maybe I have. > > I do take your point about the udev subdirectory of /lib not > containing any libs, however as I see things, > > /lib > > and hence, subdirectories of it, is arch-specfic, as it what > would be /lib64 on a system that had a mix of arches and > hence various /lib-s .
This is just your false assumption. You may believe everything in /lib should have a corresponding one in /lib64. That's incorrect. For example, "/lib64/modules" is totally unreasonable. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
