On Thu, 02 May 2019 21:39:44 +0200 Thomas Trepl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 03.05.2019, 01:58 +1000 schrieb James B via lfs-dev: > > I assume that your interest in ML does not come out of the blue. It > would be interesting to know something about the reason why you are > searching for ML stuff. The answer might help to optimize the ML stuff > and even more, if you have trouble building the ML system or trouble > while using it (e.g. missing core libraries and such). I'm maintain a multilib distro based on LFS. I used a combination of LFS/CLFS to get this done. I did this with LFS 7.5/CLFS 3.0, and more recently LFS 8.2/CLFS 2017.07. However, CLFS seems to have gone dormant now, so it is good to have an alternative. > Well, yes, some kind of ML-enabled BLFS will be the next step. On the > way to get my printer driver (32bit from DELL) working, at least > nettle has to be built with -m32 ... > Regarding pkgmngt, i started a project for my own to see&learn how > pkgmngt may work. There is no heavy development on > https://www.belfs.org since its a one-man- and spare-time show but it > works for me so far and a new rework will come up these days. > DJ has published some work on pacman for LFS. You may check > https://github.com/djlucas/LFS-systemd-pacman for that. Thanks, I will check it out. See, if you don't point this URL out to me, I won't know about it. That's why I suggested some sort of links ("additional information", or some sort of that) would be good so people who have "graduated" from LFS can see the next options and path. I myself used "paco" (now renamed as "porg") previously, but today I adopted pkgtools from Slackware for package management. cheers! -- James B -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
