On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 8:46 PM Ken Moffat via blfs-dev <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 11:53:01PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > If I get time, I'll try building with gcc (8.2.0) to see if the > > results are better or worse. > > > Started it off (ld.bfd, disable debug symbols, gcc) and got back to > it in time to watch the final link : again, that was over in the > blink of an eye. And the fastest of this set of builds. I had over > 7.5 GB ov available real memory, so no comment on how little I can > get away with for this. > > The total space and install were marginally smaller than with clang, > but since the details of both seem to fluctuate by a few KB I don't > regard that as significant. The important thing is that the disk > space, and presumably the virtual space for the linker, is > significantly smaller. Maybe it will even build on i686. > > But that's the end of this series of tests. I need to get back to > my other machine where I've been doing the first "tuning" run, dot > the i's and cross the t's, tweak one of my scripts, and then branch > my git tree so that I can update at least LFS to current (gcc-9.1) > and build that on this machine. >
Hello, I thought I'd mention that the sed used for building with system icu is not need with icu 64.1 and up. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
