On 12/18/19 5:34 AM, burak sarac via lfs-dev wrote:
Sorry for the poor formatting, yes it was wrong release numbers it
suppose to be gcc 9.2.0 and glibc-2.30.9000 and learning experience
and relying on official releases totally make sense. I was thinking
maybe there could be some CI way to track healthy upcoming releases
but I can see it is not an easy task to do it through branches with
release tags.
Please do not top post.
I admire your efforts, but suggest that they may not be productive in
the long run. We publish a new stable version of LFS/BLFS twice a year.
In each new version or LFS we have about 30 new package versions.
BLFS has hundreds of changes. Often the instructions do not change for
new package versions, but many times they do. That will make scripts
obsolete requiring manual update quite often.
We do not recommend new users use scripts. The learning comes from
reading the text and manually building, correcting problems as they occur.
For experienced users, we recommend jhalfs published on the website.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
