On 6/19/20 11:58 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, 2020-06-19 at 16:26 +0100, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
I've now been through my test logs for the new build (on my i7
haswell).
Here are a few comments (in order of testing)
bison-3.6.3
-----------
Here, I strongly disagree that the tests need to be run with -j1.
On my i3 Skylake last December I had to use -j1 to get the package
to compile, and therefore I also used -j1 on that machine if I ran
the tests. But on other machines I'm using -j8 both for the compile
and for the tests (and no failures).
Could be changed I guess
I added that because at -j22 the tests failed but passed at -j1.
I suppose I could test again at -j8. -j1 is slooow. On my last test
build bison was about twice as long as the next longest package. I'll
note that I did not run tests on most packages, but only the ones I was
updating at the time, but is was still longer than gcc without tests.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
