steve crosby wrote:
Yes, but given the frequency of the issue with recent FC releases, it
may be better to *always* apply the workaround, regardless of the host
- which will eliminate the problem completely. We can then add other
workarounds as required. At least, that's what I think Gerard meant.
That's not quite what i meant. I as just blind and completely missed the
Note box for some reason.
Always applying that workaround isn't something I would suggest myself.
It's a workaround in the end, not an issue everybody deals with. I would
consider it a little sloppy to default to that method instead of giving
the user a real choice in the matter.
Of course when I say that I'm not taking into account ease of use vs.
ease of our support network. That is definitely a valid point to take
into account. If somebody would like to take that point and run away
with it, please.
From an education standpoint, it gives the reader exposure to the
c;m;mi model eary (before they start building LFS), although we
already expect that level of knowledge from an LFS reader.
Yes I tend to agree if they don't know about that by the time they start
with the LFS book, there's a bigger problem.
--
Gerard Beekmans
/* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
