On 10/14/05, Declan Moriarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words > > I have 2 LFS installs on my Dell Inspiron laptop. One of them is a > > lfs-dev gcc 3.4.3 system with -O3, -march=pentium-m, and -ffast-math > > flags and the other is a gcc 4.0.1 with no special optimization. The > > gcc-4.0.1 system has really slow usb keyboard operation when I am in > > X-Windows, to the point where it can't keep up with my typing and I > > lose letters. > > And you need to ask us :-)? > > > > > The other question I had was what is the difference between > > /dev/mouse0 and /dev/mice? > > > > I always thought it was /dev/input/mice, but that shows you what I know.
Well it is... I am just a little sloppy sometimes. The problem went away when I changed my mice to /dev/input/mice rather than both mouse0 (which didn't work well of course). I still find myself interested in what optimization does besides make the file bigger. I have seen some small (1 or 2%) differences in the times of a tar command of a big file for instance. I guess I'll have to take the new gcc4 lfs and replicate it with heavy optimization and see if there is any difference. Thank you, -Doug -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
