On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Subhash Chandra wrote:
(strange, pine really doesn't want to quote this, I'll try doing it by
hand this time)
My slack is 2.6.11 kernel with ac patch. and it was configured with
yestoall because that was my first attempt at kernel and I missed up
on lot of things.
on the other hand, my LFS kernel is 2.6.13-4 (yeah, I forgot to
mention that diviation. Sorry) and ITE 82xx drivers were merged in it
already. So I assumed they would be better than the ac-patch.
I think that is the correct assumption.
How do you list out the modules that are loaded? I did a lsmodand got
the following output.
Module Size Used by
ipv6 225760 34
hci_usb 13448 0
bluetooth 42372 1 hci_usb
pcspkr 3548 0
rtc 10680 0
e1000 101044 0
nvidia 3706952 12
snd_intel8x0 29376 0
snd_ac97_codec 81020 1 snd_intel8x0
snd_pcm 81156 2 snd_intel8x0,snd_ac97_codec
snd_timer 21508 1 snd_pcm
snd 45796 4 snd_intel8x0,snd_ac97_codec,snd_pcm,snd_timer
snd_page_alloc 8584 2 snd_intel8x0,snd_pcm
joydev 8256 0
ntfs 195344 2
Yes, those are the modules you have loaded. Plenty of candidates for
trouble there! I'm somewhat surprised to see you are using ntfs, but
the prime candidates (based on what you wrote earlier) must be pcspkr
and the sound modules. Looking at its size, nvidia must be the wrapper
for the binary module, so if you can, try without that first.
If you can narrow it down a bit, you might want to try 2.6.14.latest
(.3 is due) to see if the problem is still present. Obviously, check
the logs in case any interesting error messages show up.
Ken
--
das eine Mal als Trag?die, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
