On 12/9/05, Richard Melville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > />/ and I've just applied the expect-5.43.0-spawn-1.patch. I received > > />/ the following output:- />/ />/ patching file exp_chan.c > > />/ Hunk #1 succeeded at 622 (offset 103 lines)
[...] > Thanks Dave. Do you mean that if the Hunks aren't listed then they > have succeeded? In addition, an offset of 103 lines isn't *off by a > line or so.* > Is this still acceptable? Yes and yes. If it was successful with no offsets, you would get output that just said what files had been patched. And the offset doesn't matter. Rest assured that patch will fail with an error if it can't apply the patch cleanly. This just means that the spot where the patch was made from has changed by 103 lines. It's totally legitimate that 103 lines of code were added or removed before or after the original line. Personally, I don't like the warnings and re-diff patches so they apply cleanly, but there's nothing wrong with offset or fuzz. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
