Greets all. I was wondering if someone could briefly explain the
difference between these 2 linkers. I'm building current SVN on a G3
Powerbook Pismo and I'm ending up with ld.so.1 for the toolchain....
(First 3 packages have compiled flawlessly by the way. I'm suprised)
I know the book clearly hints that this is not a big deal (to just
change the sed to ld.so.1), but Slackintosh and other PPC distros are
using ld-linux.so.2... For some reason, I am under the assumtion that
ld.so.1 is inferior to ld-linux.so.2...
If so, and there are clear and tangible benefits from using ld-linux,
does anyone know how I can acomplish this? The Slackintosh changelog
hints at the same problem but then they figured out how to do it without
documenting it anywhere. No patches, .SlackBuilds or anything... :-(
Just a cryptic changelog entry. Google and various src rpm Spec files
haven't been helping me much either...
Thanks everyone,
Jon
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
