On 2/2/06, Greg Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote: > > > > No problem. It's all part of the weirdness of kernel headers. Just > > because our glibc wasn't built with inotify support doesn't mean that > > an application can't access an available kernel feature. It's just up > > to the user app to handle this interface. For instance, Beagle > > includes inotify.h in it's source tree and has runtime detection to > > see if inotify is available. > > Yes, this recent thread covers the issue: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-January/msg01362.html
Thanks, Greg. That thread gives a great example of the kernel headers issue. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
