From: "Henry christenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: LFS Support List <[email protected]>
To: lfs-support <[email protected]>
Subject: Binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2 pass 1 syntax error
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:14:02 -0700

When running
  make -C ld LIB_PATH=/tools/lib

on the first pass of binutils under fedora 4 x86_64


patch does nothing to reslove the error here.  Ive also attempted to
build with gcc32 witch is gcc
3.2 instead of the
4.0 that is installed in fedora
nothing stops the syntax error.


here is the snytax error im getting

gcc32 -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -o
ld-new ldgram.o
 ldlex.o lexsup.o
 ldlang.o mri.o ldctor.o ldmain.o ldwrite.o ldexp.o ldemul.o ldver.o
ldmisc.o ldfile.o ldcref.o eelf_x86_64.o eelf_i386.o ei386linux.o
../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a ../libiberty/libiberty.a -ldl
/tools/bin/ld:/usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.2.3/../../../../lib64/libc.so:
file format not recognized; treating as linker script


/tools/bin/ld:/usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.2.3/../../../../lib64/libc.so:5:
syntax error
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [ld-new] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/ld'


make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/ld'
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
make: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/ld'
lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build$





im pretty sure this is a problem with redhat but im wondering if there
is a work around.  Primarly because there is a limited source of
x86_64 operating systems.

there are others but would be extensive to install.



getting the exact same error in fedora on x86

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to