well, short answer is yes. i created a new partition, make symbolic link to /tool, clean all enviroment variables except HOME, TERM and so on,
binutils-2.17 gcc-4.1.1 pass 1 Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0 Glibc-2.4 Tcl-8.4.13 Tk-8.4.13 Expect-5.44.1 DejaGNU-1.4.4 these all went fine, and follow the instructions in lfs-book, except packages are newer version than lfs-book. On 6/30/06, Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hi, > i'm using gcc-4.1.1 to build the tool chain, > while it blocked at pass 2, > and gcc reported no limits.h was found. > > my patch to gcc source: > in gcc/configure: > change STMP_FIXINC=stmp-fixinc > to STMP_FIXINC= > > in gcc/cppdefaults.h: > added > #undef STANDARD_INCLUDE_DIR > #define STANDARD_INCLUDE_DIR 0 > > and changed various string values in header files in gcc/config/i386/, > as mentioned in gcc-specs-patch > > and i find there is a > #include_next <limits.h> > which caused the problem, > > anyone have the same problem? > > thanks. Not likely, since it's not very likely many people are attempting LFS with that version of GCC. Have you deviated from the book in any way other than the different version of GCC? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
