On 10/13/06, Alberto Hernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
El Jueves, 12 de Octubre de 2006 17:38, Dan Nicholson escribió:
> I tried so that it said you needed Linux-PAM and pam_console. The
> important part is pam_console. If you can think of a better way to
> word this, let me know.
I don't know if this phrase is badly formed, or my English has weak points.
Could you explain what you mean better, please?
If you have Linux-PAM, then you can also install the pam_console
module. That information is on the Wiki. Several distros do this. If
you have the pam_console module and have configured login to use it,
then HAL will work out of the box with no additional configuration.
If you do not have pam_console, then you need to configure HAL so that
ordinary users can use the methods (like Mount) that are exported by
HAL. If the user cannot use these methods, HAL is only useful to see
all the information it has collected about the hardware on the system.
Is that clearer?
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
