Ken Moffat wrote:
I too would expect to see the updated time, but I've never looked
at the data and time here, so I might be missing something.

 First test: look at your command history ('history', or just
up-arrow) - did you key the command correctly ?

Yes, but.....
What I only found out now is that simple line wrapping is not working. I need to place the continuation character at the end of the line. And also should probably break up sensibly. I guess you can call this a typical Newbie error.

 Second test: diff Makefile.in{,.tmp}  - are they different ?


Now they are, orig file is 180686, new in file is 180682
Diff tells me the following:
$lfs: diff Makefile.in{,.orig}
2858c2858
<        $(SHELL) -c true ../../gcc/include \
---
>        $(SHELL) ./fixinc.sh ../../gcc/include \

And that looks good enough to me.
Would it be an idea to put the diff command for verification in the book?
Assuming that this is the output expected?

I am still trying to work out why this part of the command did not work,
as I did not get any message indicating an unsuccesful execution.

 Probably, you mis-keyed something (again, check the history if
still available).  I'm glad the check caught the problem.
Not miskeyed but broke at the wrong time with no continuation character:
That's difficult - some commands will report errors, others will
quietly end with a non-zero status [ echo $?  to check that ] and
some tend not to tell you - I'm thinking particularly of sed: error
messages from it mean syntax errors or missing files, they don't
tell you whether or not anything was changed.  So, it's easy to
mistype a sed command and either change nothing, or change the wrong
thing.  If you know what a sed is supposed to do, in early chapter 5
diff will tell you what got changed (later on, we can do in-place
seds, so diff won't help you wiht those).

Ken
echo ยง? is already another step on my learning curve. Thanks.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to