On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 15:27 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: > So, the BLFS book is sort of lying about intltool being a dependency > in various spots. Randy said the same, but I think he ultimately > decided to leave it in there since he wasn't 100% positive.
Probably reasonable to leave it, since sooner or later, someone's going to want to apply a patch that touches configure.in or something, requiring everything to be regenerated. It's an easy enough dependency to live with, and might save effort later. Simon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
