> I think because you just added another interface called eth0, and it > conflicts with the original one. > >> Does a final "alias" solution exists out there? > > Not yet, but there's a patch on the mailing list that I've been > meaning to apply. > > -- > Dan
Well, I thought this is the new way adding aliases which makes the patch unnecessary. Newer kernels supports this but ifconfig don't like that. I wonder about this old entry: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1013 Here is the blfs discussion: http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-support/2007-June/thread.html -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
