>>
>>If that doesn't have /tools, then the gcc-pass2 build was definitely borked.
>>
>>--
>>Dan
>>--
>
>That is exactly what is happening. gcc -dumpspecs responds with:
>
/>lib/ld-linux.so.2
>
>However, at the end of gcc-pass2,
>
>$echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
>$cc dummy.c
>$readelf -l a.out | grep ': /tools'
>[Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2]
>
>For clarification, it is LFS LiveCD 6.3-r2032. I am applying the patch, and
>it appears to be accepted....
>
>....
>`gcc/Makefile.in' -> `gcc/Makefile.in.orig'
>`gcc/Makefile.in' -> `gcc/Makefile.in.tmp'
>patching file gcc/config/alpha/linux-elf.h
>patching file gcc/config/arm/linux-elf.h
>patching file gcc/config/frv/linux.h
>patching file gcc/config/i386/gnu.h
>patching file gcc/config/i386/linux.h
>patching file gcc/config/i386/linux64.h
>patching file gcc/config/ia64/linux.h
>Hunk #1 succeeded at 43 with fuzz 1.
>patching file gcc/config/linux.h
>patching file gcc/config/m32r/linux.h
>patching file gcc/config/m68k/linux.h
>patching file gcc/config/mips/linux.h
>patching file gcc/config/mips/linux64.h
>patching file gcc/config/mn10300/linux.h
>patching file gcc/config/pa/pa-linux.h
>patching file gcc/config/rs6000/linux64.h
>patching file gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h
>patching file gcc/config/s390/linux.h
>Hunk #1 succeeded at 86 with fuzz 2.
>patching file gcc/config/sh/linux.h
>patching file gcc/config/sparc/linux.h
>patching file gcc/config/sparc/linux64.h
>patching file gcc/config/xtensa/linux.h
>mkdir: created directory `gcc-build'
>....
>
>I also verified that /gcc-4.1.2/gcc/config/linux.h was modified. So at this
>point, I am a little stumped...
>
>Any other ideas where to poke around? Obviously it must be something that I
>am doing, otherwise others would have said something by now...
>
>Here is the complete command set that I am using to build gcc-pass2...
>
>.............
>
>cd $LFS/builds
>rm -vrf gcc-build
>rm -vrf gcc-4.1.2
>tar -xjvf $LFS/sources/gcc-4.1.2.tar.bz2
>cd gcc-4.1.2
>cp -v gcc/Makefile.in{,.orig} && sed '[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>true@' gcc/Makefile.in.orig > gcc/Makefile.in
>cp -v gcc/Makefile.in{,.tmp} && sed 's/^XCFLAGS =$/& -fomit-frame-pointer/'
>gcc/Makefile.in.tmp > gcc/Makefile.in
>patch -Np1 -i ../../sources/gcc-4.1.2-specs-1.patch
>cd ..
>mkdir -v gcc-build
>cd gcc-build
>time { ../gcc-4.1.2/configure --prefix=/tools --with-local-prefix=/tools
>--enable-clocale=gnu --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix \
>>--enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-libstdcxx-pch &&
>make && make -k check && make install; }
>
>..........
>
I've been offline for the last couple of days, but I would like to revive this
thread to see if anyone has had a chance to noodle this one. Again, from the
preceding messages in the thread, one can read what has occurred and the
attempts to isolate the cause... essentially during through gcc-pass2, even
though the patch is successfully applied, and the end build test is positive,
the gcc specs but NOT drop /usr/include. This will then effect the build of
ncurses, failing on the GPM dependency. This using LiveCD 6.3 r2032 & r2052.
If the consensus of group feels that it should be re-directed to livecd list, I
will do so...
TIA,
ejb
____________________________________________________________________________________
Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the
tools to get online.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
