On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 02:37:39PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 10/25/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Last time I looked, the TTF version of FreeFont was pretty nasty > > (sizes too small), but still a necessary fallback for obscure > > characters (e.g. some of the Lappish glyphs). I didn't think it > > helped with whitespace, but I could be mistaken. But, unless you > > are using really uncommon European glyphs (which I do, e.g. in > > testing sigma-consolefonts) there is likely to be a more pleasant > > version of the glyph in a different font. > > Sure. I just meant that if he wants to get a character and not fool > around with fonts for a while, install FreeFont and be done with it. > That wasn't intended to attack your point of view (although I wonder why people _wouldn't_ want to fool around with fonts ;-) but just to suggest that FreeFont might not be adequate for whitespace. But, I'm no longer certain which fonts I added in what order, so perhaps FreeFont will do the job.
ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
