From: John Whitmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>checking for autoconf... no
>configure: WARNING:
>*** These auxiliary programs are missing or incompatible versions: autoconf
>*** some features will be disabled.
>*** Check the INSTALL file for required versions.
autoconf is used by the developers to generate the configure script itself. You
can ignore this warning.
>I don't have any errors produced in the "make" but I do have a few
>errors in the "make -k check":
>
>make[2]: [/source/glibc/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
>
>Didn't expect signal from child: got `Aborted'
>make[2]: *** [/source/glibc/glibc-build/nptl/tst-cancel1.out] Error 1
>
>make[2]: Target `tests' not remade because of errors.
>rm /source/glibc/glibc-build/nptl/test-as-const-lowlevelcond.c
>/source/glibc/glibc-build/nptl/test-as-const-pthread-pi-defines.c
>/source/glibc/glibc-build/nptl/test-as-const-unwindbuf.c
>/source/glibc/glibc-build/nptl/test-as-const-lowlevelrwlock.c
>/source/glibc/glibc-build/nptl/test-as-const-lowlevelbarrier.c
>/source/glibc/glibc-build/nptl/test-as-const-pthread-errnos.c
>/source/glibc/glibc-build/nptl/test-as-const-lowlevelrobustlock.c
>make[2]: Leaving directory `/source/glibc/glibc-2.5.1/nptl'
>make[1]: *** [nptl/tests] Error 2
The annexc test is expected to fail and can be ignored. As for the others....
are you using a Debian based host by any chance? nptl tests are known to fail
on Debian based systems so if you are you can ignore these too.
Does running "make install" generate any errors? If not and there are no other
issues than everything looks fine and you can continue.
Good luck! :-)
Walter
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get easy, one-click access to your favorites.
Make Yahoo! your homepage.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
