martin welsh wrote: > Download address apparently no longer functional. > Will less-416 be a suitable substitute?
I upgraded all my machines to less-416 and build a new LFS with it. I did not notice any changes, certainly no adverse effects. I'd say: Just go with 416. I wouldn't consider less to be a critical application, anyway. I.e., even if it has bugs, it will not affect the rest of your system, especially not compilations. Hans-Joachim -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
