Thomas Trepl wrote: >> ..boots and is running on my old AMD k6-2 300mhz w/128 mbram. > Need a bit of time for LFS, isn't it? Yes, but it's IS doing a lot of work, the old friend! I'm slow anyhow. > files recorded without the leading slash (somewhat like mnt/lfs/...) > This was intended for being a security feature in tar to avoid > overwriting the root file system by accident. > ...The restore will be done in the current directory, not in / . Ah, I see ,, very good. >> cd $LFS >> tar -cjf /some/dir/mytarball.tar.bz2 . >> because the directory nesting is not so deep in the archive. Understood... I had other things in there and was interested only in /tools at this point but if it keeps going as well as it has thusfar, I just might be backing up something a bit more substatial soon!
Thanks for the quick reply. Very helpful... Howard(); -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
