Nick Parrott wrote: > hi chris, > > i'm only compiling the intial toolchain, which I believe should be > done in /mnt/lfs/tools.. with a symlink in the root of the fs of > "tools"
No, the book says everything is to be *installed* into /tools. It says to keep your sources and patches in $LFS/sources and unpack and compile there. > correct, make shouldn't be run but I went with the flow, the LFS book > advised errors are l likely however can be ignored.. so went ahead > with the make It does not say that. You must have misread something - it says you might see compiler "warnings", and also says there may various failures and/or errors for some package testsuites - however you should NEVER get any other errors outside of what the book explicitly says. > ls of /tools/lib gives; > libbfd.a libbfd.la libiberty.a libopcodes.a libopcodes.la > > i think the main issue here is that my previous make of TCL didn't > complete, as per the issue in the following post.. the tcl ./configure > runs fine, infact the last operation is creating the tclConfig.sh.. so > why expect fails to find this.. I don't know. the make fails with the > error in the post I referenced in the last mail.. > > thanks in advance.. There's a lot more than tcl that's the problem. I'm also not seeing any of the libraries for gcc or glibc - looks like the only thing you've successfully installed so far is binutils. This means that gcc and glibc must have some kind of errors as well, which you skipped over. You need to rm -rf /tools/* and start over. Judging from some of your comments here, it is also clear that you need to go back to the very beginning of the book and re-read EVERYTHING - every word - as apparently there is a lot that you missed. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
