On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:10:51PM -0400, Satish Patel wrote:
> my hostreq output is this
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# sh version-check.sh
> bash, version 3.2.25(1)-release
> Binutils: (GNU Binutils
> bison (GNU Bison) 2.3
> bzip2, Version 1.0.4, 20-Dec-2006.
> Coreutils: 5.97
> diff (GNU diffutils) 2.8.1
> GNU find version 4.2.31
> GNU Awk 3.1.5
> gcc (GCC) 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)
> GNU C Library stable release version 2.6.1,
> grep (GNU grep) 2.5.1
> gzip 1.3.12
> Linux version 2.6.22-14-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.3
> 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)) #1 SMP Sun Oct 14
> 23:05:12 GMT 2007
> GNU Make 3.81
> patch 2.5.9
> GNU sed version 4.1.5
> tar (GNU tar) 1.18
>
>
> kindy tell me what change i have to do.
>
Those look reasonable. In particular, you are using gawk ("GNU Awk
3.1.5") and your kernel is a variant of 2.6.22.14 compiled with the
system compiler (a prerelease version of gcc-4.1.3).
The only "oddity" is your binutils - it's probably a new version
which presents the information in a different format. You might
want to look at the whole output from 'ld --version', but AFAIK
there haven't been any issues with recent versions of binutils on
the x86 architecture.
Previously, you wrote:
> Linux Kernel-2.6.x (having been compiled with GCC-3.0 or greater)
>
> i dont understand it ?
We can see that your kernel is indeed from the 2.6 series with a
suitable compiler. The reason for that requirement was that people
sometimes tried to build from a host running a 2.4 kernel, and for
2.4 kernels the recommended compiler was gcc-2.95.3 - that is no
longer supported by the 2.6 kernel source.
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
