Mike McCarty wrote: > Justin P. Mattock wrote: > >> With your host system you probably have >> libselinux(and so forth), I recommend to go ahead and >> building everything with SELiux support, >> then, at the end of the day if you decide to add a policy >> you do, if not then you don't. (at least the system has a security >> infrastructure). >> >> Justin P. Mattock >> > > I recommend that, for a first build, NO DEVIATIONS are made from > the directions in the book. > > Also, personally, one of the reasons I have built LFS is so I > WON'T have SeLinux on my machine. Like everything, there are > advantages and disadvantages to having SeLinux, even if it is > not "enabled". > > YMMV > > Mike > Some people like it some people hate it, in any case it shouldn't be that big of an issue if something gets compiled with a header or so. (but could be wrong).
My guess is using a host system that has nothing of SELinux on it at all before you start compiling all of the packages. or the opposite if you want to enable SELinux. Justin P. Mattock -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
