Tobias Gasser wrote: > as the sendpage-problem seems to be a serious vulnerability in the > kernel, i propose to add a paragraph in the errata-section and in the > kernel chapters (5.6.1 / 8.3). in my opinion even an update to lfs 6.5.1 > (or 6.6 is subnumbering is not acceptable) would be ok. > > i had no issues here building a new lfs with kernel 2.6.30.5. most > changes from 2.6.30.2 seem to be minor fixes.
In the All Packages section is a note: "The Linux kernel is updated relatively often, many times due to discoveries of security vulnerabilities. The latest available 2.6.30.x kernel version should be used, unless the errata page says otherwise." So I think we're covered. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
