Le Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:23:03 -0500, stosss <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Why does LFS stay so far ahead of BLFS? What is the point of building > the newest LFS if the BLFS files are older and probably won't work or > would be replacing newer versions of apps with older versions? > > There is a note on the BLFS that says in one or two months a new BLFS > will be released. There is no date as to when that was put there or a > target date for release. What is the target date for that one or two > months? > > Use SVN if you are using LFS 6.4 what about LFS 6.5? > > It looks like the smart thing to do to avoid problems would be to > build LFS 6.4 and then BLFS SVN/6.4 which is the reason for my > orginial question in the subject. I think one thing is not in the book : the answer to the question "why is this package not in the book/why is this version so old/why doesn't the book evolve any faster...". Come on, guys, what do you think you are dealing with ? This is an entirely free, cooperative work. Nothing advances if noone provides work for it to move on. So the correct answer to those questions should be : "move your ass, you bl...y bas...rd !!!". \bye -- Nicolas FRANCOIS | /\ http://nicolas.francois.free.fr | |__| X--/\\ We are the Micro$oft. _\_V Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. darthvader penguin -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
