On 12/15/2009 02:33 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > 2009/12/15 Mike McCarty<[email protected]>: > > Right (for My Machine, My Rules), but historically we've seen > problems when people try to use newer toolchains than are > in the book (i.e. build failures). > > In general, it's very hard to recommend that anyone use an > LFS book older than the latest release. For BLFS, at least for > those desktop packages which are in BLFS, the development > book is often far more up to date (although, at the moment, > it probably still has a lot that hasn't changed since the 6.3 > release). > > ĸen
Generally, yeah, but about the only reason (that I know of) that anyone would use 6.3 is because it's what's on the most recent livecd, in which case the host would certainly be the same as the book anyway. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
