brown wrap wrote: > Yes, the sys.log I attached is a result of leaving one out. It > changed the symptoms slightly, but it still didn't work. I will try > leaving the other out tomorrow. But I have a working Centos system > and the kernel that is working has a config file and I think both > were enabled.
Did you compare the CentOS dmesg with the one from LFS? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
