On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 20:04 +0000, Ken Moffat wrote: > On 25 March 2010 20:00, Mike McCarty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > A nit, but nits are important in this context, shouldn't that be > > /dev/sda16 ? Or did I miss something? > > > > No, this is grub2 - on x86, disks still start at zero, but dos partitions > have their "real" number (1-4 for primary, 5+ for extended) so (hd0,15) > is indeed sda15.
Yeah... because having them inconsistent is less confusing than having them both start at zero? You say *dos* partitions - does grub2 behave differently for other types of partition table? Simon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
