On 03/26/2010 11:36 PM, stosss wrote: > > You really have a bad attitude. I wasn't being insulting. You are the > worst one when it comes to be caustic toward any suggestions. Your > reply is always, "the book is clear". You are also quick to say, "you > did something wrong" "you didn't read some part of the book". "if you > read the book you wouldn't have made that mistake" You are the primary > one for so much friction in this project. > > Go learn how to communicate. >
Yeah, most of the time, peoples' problems *are* because they don't read the book. Granted, on occasion I *do* jump to that conclusion a bit early and unnecessarily, but past history makes it clear that many people just skip much of the text (and yes, a number of users who have problems have *admitted* to not paying much attention to the text - or frequently people do read but just forget some important part), which is what causes most problems. Oh well, why am I concerned with your opinion of me...my primary interest is in ensuring that the book is both technically and grammatically accurate, as well as understandable for the non-expert...and that's true whether you think so or not. So, sometimes I happen to disagree on what might be "correct" or "understandable"...big deal, nobody's perfect... I'd like to say something like "I don't care what you say so I'm just not responding to further comments" but then I know how much I always just *have* to add further responses (this one being a case in point), so...we'll see how I do... -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
