Baho Utot wrote: > On 06/01/10 15:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Paul Rogers wrote: >> >>> As seems >>> indicated by the current situation, someone should adopt a QC role, and >>> have one system that trails, i.e. has exactly the package versions >>> specified in the HSR, and verifies that each version of LFS does in fact >>> install flawlessly with those prerequisites. >> Volunteers welcomed. > > I'll volunteer...I can mess up anything :)
Excellent. > At this moment I have just about recovered my LFS 6.5/BLFS devel system, > from my LFS-6.3 build script screw up which, Ahem over wrote LFS-6.5 > with the files/package from LFS-6.3. Care to guess when the host system > puked? > I am going to try it again as I am a gluten for punishment. Can you please explain a little more. You are doing to start with a new 6.3 LFS system and build LFS-6.6? Please do report back any successes or problems. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
