On 14 July 2010 20:18, Dan McGhee <beesn...@grm.net> wrote: > > The GlibC install wants to install sg.h, scsi.h and scsi_ioctl.h in > /usr/include/scsi. There are two ways in which to get the install > process to proceed. The first is for me to manually remove scsi.h and > let glibc do it's thing. The other is for me to delete the installation > of scsi.h from the makefile. This is the only instance of this type of > conflict between glibc and linux headers. > > So, my question is: Does it make a difference which header file is in > /usr/include/scsi or is one better than the other? The answer to this > question will dictate which of the two actions I will take. > If you weren't using the package users hint, the problem would not arise. Therefore we can assume that allowing the kernel's headers to be installed is the well-tested choice.
In the sense that LFS is "your distro, your rules" you are, of course, free to do things differently. I've no idea *which* packages in a fully-built system use these particular headers (probably, not much in LFS itself). Taking a look at the two sets of headers, they aren't *that* different, so it is possible that both *might* work. ĸen -- After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!" -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
