On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:09 PM, William Tracy <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:06 PM, James Rhodes > <[email protected]> wrote: >> At least for me, most of the dislike for package management systems is the >> fact that they're so hard to understand how they're storing all of their >> information and organizing applications. Neither Debian or RPM systems I've >> seen offer an easy-to-understand package management system > > (Sorry to resurrect a dead thread.) > > You might want to take a peek at T2's packaging system: > <http://t2-project.org/> Among other things, they have the interesting > ability to automatically generate dependency trees by tracking what > headers each program references at build time. Also their tools are > 90% written in Bash for easy hacking. :-) (Though I'm sure some would > argue that's a bad thing.) > > Actually, the original poster to this thread might be happier with T2 > than with LFS: T2 provides an installer, and lets you populate it with > packages you build yourself. > > -- > William Tracy > Work: [email protected] > Play: [email protected] > Cell phone: (805) 704-0917 > Internet phone: (707) 206-6441 > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page >
Hey, thanks. I will take a look for more details, at this moment the installer I made is working pretty good, does't have to much option, but can do the job without problem. Best regards PS: I was thinking about implementing some packman on my distro, so maybe T2 can be of a good help =) --- Maginot Jr. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
