On 4 August 2010 23:46, Andrew Benton <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/08/10 20:42, Ken Moffat wrote: >> On 4 August 2010 19:23, Dan McGhee<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Does this mean that we should revert to make-3.81 and proceed merrily >>> from there? Maybe just continue on with the current SVN and document >>> failures to the list? I'm building x86_64 and there was a note on the >>> ticket that glibc built fine without the patch. > > >> I'm going with Andy's first suggestion (see the other thread). >> >> ĸen (mightily confused by the gmail interface changes) > > I would suggest this sed, it works for me: > > sed -i 's/ot \$/ot:\n\ttouch $...@\n$/' manual/Makefile > > Run that in the glibc sources, before you cd ../glibc-build > I used it to compile this system and so far things have gone Ok. > procps needed a sed: > > sed -i 's:e \*/m:e proc/module.mk ps/m:' Makefile > > But other than those 2 things, most other things seem Ok with make-3.82 > > Andy > --
Thanks - I'll leave Matt to decide what he's going to do about the glibc changes. My base LFS system (apart from the kernel) has now built. ĸen -- After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!" -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
