Actually, I was more concerned with the missing '/' in the last search path. Instead of '/lib' it is just 'lib' .
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:05 PM, William Immendorf <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Thiago Padilha <[email protected]> wrote: >> When I verify the linker search path the output should be : >> >> SEARCH_DIR("/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib") >> SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib") >> SEARCH_DIR("/lib"); >> >> Mine is : >> >> SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib64") >> SEARCH_DIR("/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib") >> SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib") >> SEARCH_DIR("lib"); > You are building a 64-bit system, hence the extra search path. You can > keep building, just remember that there are some diffrences along the > way. Also, you can use the development version if you want, with > kernel 2.6.35.3. > > > -- > William Immendorf > The ultimate in free computing. > Messages in plain text, please, no HTML. > GPG key ID: 1697BE98 > If it's not signed, it's not from me. > > -------------- > > "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- > and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
