On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:01:31PM -0500, Mike Hollis wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 04:28:02PM -0500, Neal Murphy wrote: > > On Tuesday 21 December 2010 12:22:05 Mike Hollis wrote: > > > ... but I don't know how to call this core > > > with gdb (gdb make core ? gdb gcc core ?) and even if I did it would > > > probably not be useful for me. > > > > "gdb fail31-frag.exe core" is probably what will work, ifyou can find the > > fail31-frag program. > > -- > > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > I actually have 2 cores one in gcc and one in g++. > Using gdb -c core in gcc points to builtin-apply-mmx.exe > and the c++ core points to raw-string-7.exe. > > I found fail31-frag.c,builtin-apply-mmx.c, and raw-string-7.c > and tried compiling them and the first 2 compiled; raw-string-7.c > failed but it was meant to. I doubt that any of this is relevent > out of the context of the test suite. > > What I wonder about are the exe extensions ; why should it be > looking for an exe on linux? > > I think I'll go ahead and use it and see what happens. I think it is > a bug in the test suite itself. > > Thanks, > Had a problem getting mail up , bdb doesn't seem to work. Going into the bit bucket.
Now I'm wondering about jhalfs; I installed LFS from svn about a month ago manually and had no problem. Has anyone used SVN-20101219 with jhalfs successfully , other than the the vim test failure ? --- M. Hollis --- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
