On Saturday 30 April 2011 01:11:01 Simon Geard wrote: > Andrew's post is missing a newline, I think. It's actually two rules: > > SUBSYSTEM=="rtc", ACTION=="add", > MODE="0644", > RUN+="/etc/rc.d/init.d/setclock start" > > and > > KERNEL=="rtc", ACTION=="add", > MODE="0644", > RUN+="/etc/rc.d/init.d/setclock start" > > Simon.
Ah, that makes more sense. But still, the kernel name is 'rtc0' (zero) which would explain why that particular rule is ineffective; the SUBSYSTEM rule becomes redundant. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
