On 07/17/2011 02:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote: >> Actually, this check needs to be removed. It causes issues for the alsa >> script and also setclock (if used to set hwclock when network goes down >> in RL2). > > Wouldn't this be just as easy as creating symlinks S50setclock in rc0 > and rc6 in the LFS Makefile? In the same way, creating S35alsa symlinks > in the BLFS Makefile would save the asla settings. >
No. Drop to RL1 with alsa volumes restored via udev for an example of why that block should be removed. It doesn't matter for 0 and 6 because the check is skipped. It's been a while, but IIRC, the same thing for a K??setclock link in RL2. This is proper IMO when using NTP, but not really useful in practice. I don't do this any longer, but with the gradual change to udev scripts handling start up items instead of boot scripts for specific hardware (this will likely happen whether we like it or not), it would probably be good to be prepared for it (not to mention the alsa breakage that is there now). -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
