On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:33:25PM -0400, Franck Chuiton wrote: > Hi everybody ! > I had first tried to build my LFS with a live CD but I eventually ended > up installing this Crunbang on the hard drive and starting over for a > new build. > So far, I've had no problem (seems to me, at least...). > I am not even sure I have one today : > The gcc tests ended up with this : > [ snipping except the unexpected failures ] > === libmudflap tests === > > > Running target unix > FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail40-frag.c output pattern test > -- > === libmudflap Summary === > > # of expected passes 1406 > # of unexpected failures 21 [...] > > So, please, is it a PASS ? Can I carry on ? > > Thanks in advance. > > Franck Chuiton <[email protected]> > I no longer build on i686, only x86_64, but that seems *remarkably* good to me - no failures at all in gcc itself! On x86_64 I see failures in the gcc torture test, and rather fewer failures than you are getting in libmudflap. But, I suspect the libmudflap testsuite is best not discussed in polite company!
Unless anyone else has very different i686 results, I think you are probably fine to carry on. As always, what really matters is not what the testsuite says, but whether the resulting system is good enough to build the packages you wish to run. If you saw dozens of failures all over the suite I would say there was a problem. If you saw up to a dozen (in different tests), there *might* be a problem. To get an apparently large number of failures from ONE libmudflap test doesn't convince me that anything is wrong. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
