Hi Team, Did you get a chance to look into my below mail? I waited for two days before sending this gentle reminder.
If you have time please reply to it. Also, if you have any feedback you can openly give that, I would accept and work on it. I am little afraid of not getting replies to my queries. Thanks much, Emerson On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Emerson Yesupatham <yemerson1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > My below mail got bounced. By mistake I sent it o lfs-support-request. > > Hi, > > I am going through toolchain technical notes for the second time to > understand it better. > > From the Book: > "Slightly adjusting the name of the working platform, by changing the > "vendor" field target triplet by way of the LFS_TGT variable, ensures > that the first build of Binutils and GCC produces a compatible > cross-linker and cross-compiler. Instead of producing binaries for > another architecture, the cross-linker and cross-compiler will produce > binaries compatible with the current hardware." > > In order to understand the above point, I have cross-compiled the > binutils as per pass-1 configure instructions. Also I have compiled it > separately for my config.guess target (basically not cross-compiling) > and ran the below command and took the difference > >>>./ld --verbose | grep SEARCH >>>SEARCH_DIR("/tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/lib"); > > The search path shows that the cross-linker searches only inside > /tools/target-triplet/lib folder and not searching in HOST's folders > like /usr/lib, /usr/local/lib and /lib, thus removes dependency on > host system. This part is fine, I could understand. > > Coming to the next point. > "The temporary libraries are cross-compiled. Because a cross-compiler > by its nature cannot rely on anything from its host system, this > method removes potential contamination of the target system by > lessening the chance of headers or libraries from the host being > incorporated into the new tools." > > When we say librarires are cross-compiled, what exactly we mean? In > libraries also any hard-wired PATHS are present and they are modified > to /tools/target-triplet/ ? > I mean, when we cross-compile the linker (above) it limits its search > folder within /tools/ , without cross-compilation it would have > searched in /usr/lib/ etc. Similarly any changes (path names, inculde > path etc) happens in the library files (say libc.so/.a)? > > or by cross-compilation of libraries we mean libraries which are > present inside /tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/lib ONLY are used hence forth > by cross-linker and cross-compiler? > > Thanks for bearing the questions. Looking forward your inputs. > > Thanks, > Emerson -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page