On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 08:47:04PM +0100, Michiel van Oosterhout wrote: > > Hi Nicholas, > > > > Thanks your taking the time to respond. I went back to ch. 5.7 and rand > the > > commands to create and compile dummy.c. The response I get from readelf > is > > > > [Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2] > > > > > > So I checked /tools and what I have is /tools/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2. I > > don't have /tools/lib64. > > > > I am going to try again from scratch :-) > > > > Thanks again! > > > > -Michiel > > > If you have already started again, I guess you've found what you > missed. If you haven't, at the bottom of binutils pass 1 is > |If building on x86_64, create a symlink to ensure the sanity of the > |toolchain: > | > |case $(uname -m) in > | x86_64) mkdir -v /tools/lib && ln -sv lib /tools/lib64 ;; > |esac > > I must have missed that, thank you! > Please don't top post. Thanks. > ĸen > -- > das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page >
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
