loki wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 22:05 +0200, loki wrote:
> tried a new build. The same error. The host system is ubuntu 12.04. The
> compile itself was without errors. Can I install binutils even with this
> make check error? Here are some more details:
>
> excerpt from gas.log:
>
>> ../as-new -o dump.o /sources/binutils-2.23.1/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/rept.s
>> Executing on host: sh -c {../as-new -o dump.o
>> /sources/binutils-2.23.1/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/rept.s 2>&1} /dev/null
>> gas.out (timeou
>> t = 300)
>> spawn [open ...]
>> sh: line 1: 10493 Killed ../as-new -o dump.o
>> /sources/binutils-2.23.1/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/rept.s 2>&1
>> sh: line 1: 10493 Killed ../as-new -o dump.o
>> /sources/binutils-2.23.1/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/rept.s 2>&1
>> /sources/binutils-build/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/nm-new --extern-only
>> dump.o
>> Executing on host: sh -c
>> {/sources/binutils-build/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/nm-new --extern-only
>> dump.o >dump.out 2>gas.stderr} /d
>> ev/null (timeout = 300)
>> spawn [open ...]
>> extra regexps in /sources/binutils-2.23.1/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/rept.d
>> starting with "^0+0 D _pad_data$"
>> EOF from dump.out
>> FAIL: gas/i386/rept
It's unlikely that the host system causes the issue above.
When not running in chroot I get the same failure, but it passes in
chroot. I don't want to try to figure out the exact cause of failure,
but I think you can continue.
=== gas Summary ===
# of expected passes 670
../as-new 2.23.2
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
