>________________________________ > From: William Harrington <[email protected]> >To: Richard <[email protected]>; LFS Support List ><[email protected]> ... >> # of expected passes92870 >> # of expected failures259 >> # of unsupported tests1096 ... ># of expected passes 92152 ># of expected failures 263 ># of unsupported tests 1283 ... ># of expected passes 93302 ># of expected failures 261 ># of unsupported tests 1368
Thanks for the info. So, at the risk of sounding irretrievably stupid, why are there differing number of tests for the same source? I could understand two separate builds on different hardware having different numbers of unsupported tests, but I was expecting the totals to still be the same. Unless I have mistyped or my mathematics has completely left me: 92870 + 259 + 1096 = 94225 92152 + 263 + 1283 = 93698 93302 + 261 + 1368 = 94931 I'm struggling to understand why we have differing numbers of tests for the same package. (In fairness, the point is now somewhat moot since I have gone ahead with the install - I am just trying to get a better understanding of things. My reasons for attempting LFS are as much educational as practical.) Again, many thanks, R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
