The result of "$ ls -laF /tools" is "lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Jun 30
22:13 /tools -> /mnt/lfs/tools/"
The result of "echo $LFS" is "/mnt/lfs" as it should be.

Seems I should change the group and owner of the /tools?

And because of my poor English, I can not understand the following question:

"Also, am asking the following questions re sudo and directories existing,
just as basic sanity checks; e.g. there have been recent-ish problems with
sudo interfering with paths/environment-vars."

I guess that I do something wrong with "sudo" command?
Can you make these questions more flat to understand? Thanks a lot!

2014-07-02 20:39 GMT+08:00 akhiezer <[email protected]>:
>> Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 19:48:32 +0800
>> From: ???????????? <[email protected]>
>> To: LFS Support List <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] cant not find `crt1.o` `crti.o` and `crtn.o`
>>
>> The 'tools' directory means $LFS/tools and the $LFS=/mnt/lfs
>> I thought everyone following this book knows that so I did not metion it.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> 2014-07-02 18:57 GMT+08:00 akhiezer <[email protected]>:
>> >> Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 18:44:26 +0800
>> >> From: ???????????? <[email protected]>
>> >> To: LFS Support List <[email protected]>
>> >> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] cant not find `crt1.o` `crti.o` and `crtn.o`
>> >>
>> >> I am a new bie so forgive me ..
>> >> The linux-3.13.3 directory locates in $LFS/sources, it was extracted
>> >> from the linux-3.13.3.tar.xz ------ just as we did in chapter 5.6
>> >> We do the chapter 5.6 in this directory. As the books says in early
>> >> chapters, we should remove all the extra directorys after we finish
>> >> the chapter. But this princple does NOT apply for this chapter.
>> >> If I missed something, welcome contact me again.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > What does /tools point to? And what is your $LFS value?
>> >
>
>
> Yes, I know what they should be in theory: but am asking what in practice
> do you get from the output of the commands:
>
> $ ls -laF /tools
>
> $ echo $LFS
>
> I.e. am not asking what they _should_ be, but instead what the output is
> in practice.
>
>
> Also, am asking the following questions re sudo and directories existing,
> just as basic sanity checks; e.g. there have been recent-ish problems with
> sudo interfering with paths/environment-vars.
>
>
>> >
>> >>
>> >         .
>> >         .
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Just a quick skim:
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > * do those include dirs actually exist.
>> >
>> >
>> > (Also the library and other dirpaths, per earlier note).
>> >
>> >
>> >> >> > * there have been crt... issues hit by folks over past few months - 
>> >> >> > should be on lists.
>> >> >> > * are you running the commands using sudo ?
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >
>> >
>>
>
>
> rgds,
> akh
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to